Maize straw/stover

Frank Kuechenmeister

Maize straw/stover normally consists of variable proportions of the leaves, stalks, and cobs of maize plants left in a field after harvest. It can be a valuable addition in ruminant feeding (dairy, beef, heifers, small ruminants) as it has the highest feeding value of all cereal straws. It is also a good source of fiber which can replace cereal straws if they are not available, or if additional fiber is needed or if there is a lack of forages.

It can yield between 6-13t DM/ha, but approximately only 40-60% is harvestable due to harvest technology. It is also a valuable addition for Biogas production. The Biogas yield of 1 kg DM of maize stover/straw can be up 80-90% biogas compared to 1 kg DM of conventional maize silage. Maize stover can be stored as silage or dry as straw.

Figure 1: Harvest of maize kernels

 

Harvest and ensiling

Maize stover/straw has a very variable dry matter, yield and chemical composition due to harvest times, harvest techniques, varieties and climate conditions, but this shouldn’t make producers discount this straw as a valuable addition to their feeding programmes.

There are two ways of harvesting the crop, the first is to harvest just the stubbles with a chopper the second is to bring the maize stover to a windrow (Figure 2) with common or specialized technique and pick it up with a chopper (Figure 3) or a loading wagon.

Harvesting should be done within 24 hours after kernel harvest as feeding values and ensiling properties will change significantly due to maturation and microbial processes, e.g. sugar and protein content as well as digestibility will decrease while fiber, DM and mycotoxin levels can increase.

Harvesting and ensiling tips

  • Avoid soil contamination and check swathing equipment
  • DM highly variable: Between 25-80%
  • Water-soluble carbohydrates: 5-12% in DM
  • Bulk density of fresh chopped material is around 65 kg DM/m3
  • Compacted density in the silo under practical conditions will be around 100-180 kg DM/m3, but the higher the compaction, the better quality silage produced
  • Use an oxygen barrier cover
  • Due to difficult compaction, there is a high risk of reheating and molding at feed out. To reduce that risk, following good silo management procedures. The use of a silage inoculant that is proven to improve aerobic stability of opening is highly recommended.

Figure 2. Maize stover/straw in a windrow

Figure 3. Picking up the windrow with a chopper

 

Figure 4. Making maize stover/straw silage

 

Figure 5. Maize stover/straw silage

Feeding

The feed value is highly variable (Table 1) and depends on the maturity of the plant at harvest, but it should be fed like other cereal straws or grass hay.

Attention should be paid as to all crops with high sugars to the possibility of mycotoxins. It is recommended that as well as testing for feed values, the silage is tested for mycotoxins and a applicable mycotoxin binder added to the TMR to ensure no issues are encountered.

Table 1: Chemical composition of maize stover/straw

Literature and further information

Adebowale E. A., 1992, Maize residues as ruminant feed resources in Nigeria. In Branckaert R. D. S. (Ed.) Better feeding for improved production. World Animal Review, FAO http://www.fao.org/3/U8750T/u8750T0d.htm

Bostami A. B. M. R., Khan R. I., Amin M. R., Sarker N. R., Pervage S., Hasan K., 2008, Effects of addition of molasses and period of preservation on physical and nutritional properties of maize stover silage. Bang. J. Anim. Sci. 37. 42-51

Feedipedia, Maize stover. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/16072

Fleschhut M., Thurner S., Ostertag J., Eder J., 2017, Abschlussbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben Verwertung von Körnermaisstroh für die Biogasproduktion (N/14/07). Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschat (LfL) https://www.lfl.bayern.de/ipz/mais/076707/index.php?fontsize=1

Katoch R., Tripathi A. A., Sood S., 2017, Improving nutritive value of maize stover – A review. Forage Res. 43. 174-180

Prada e Silva L. F., Cassoli L. D., Roman Junior L. C., de Oliveira Rodrigues A. C., Machado P. F., 2008, In situ degradability of corn stover and elephant-grass harvested at four stages of maturity. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) 65. 595-603

Tang S. X., Li F. W., Gan J., Wang M., Zhou C. S., Sun Z. H., Han X. F., Tan Z. L. 2011, Effects of sown season and maturity stage on in vitro fermentation and in sacco degradation characteristics of new variety maize stover. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 24. 781-790

Terler G., Gruber L., Knaus W. F., 2019, Nutritive value of ensiled maize stover from nine different varieties harvested at three different stages of maturity. Grass Forage Sci. 74. 53-64

Thurner S., Burger T., Dandikas V., Schaffner S., Ganal M., Kirchmeier H., Strobl M., 2019, Körnermaisstroh. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Landtechnik und Landwirtschaftliches Bauwesen in Bayern e.V. (ALB) (Ed.) https://www.biogas-forum-bayern.de/media/files/0005/k-rnermaisstroh.pdf

Lallemand Animal Nutrition does not purport, in this guide or in any other publication, to specify minimum safety or legal standards or to address all of the compliance requirements, risks, or safety problems associated with working on or around farms. This guide is intended to serve only as a beginning point for information and should not be construed as containing all the necessary compliance, safety, or warning information, nor should it be construed as representing the policy of Lallemand Animal Nutrition. No warranty, guarantee, or representation is made by Lallemand Animal Nutrition as to the accuracy or sufficiency of the information and guidelines contained herein, and Lallemand Animal Nutrition assumes no liability or responsibility in connection therewith. It is the responsibility of the users of this guide to consult and comply with pertinent local, state, and federal laws, regulations, and safety standards.

Leave us a comment